← Back to Overview
Overall Page Changes — Apply Before Sections
-
Remove
1. Remove "An Open Research System" section entirely (reads like a slide deck — philosophy already communicated through The Insight and The Choice)
-
Remove
2. Remove all 4 "Nutrient Name" placeholder cards (nutrients belong on How It Works, not the manifesto)
-
Remove
3. Remove all 6 "WHY BIZZ?" labels (every section has the same label = none useful)
Media sourcing: No photography needed — pure typography + atmosphere. Dark warm gradient with subtle grain texture. Source: Alessandro (design). Timeline: Can start immediately.
- KeepPhilosophy copy about intensity vs. stability
-
Change
1. Tighten into clear emotional hook (see copy block below)
-
Change
2. No product image — this page opens with ideas, not commerce
-
Change
3. Hero should feel like opening a book — moody, atmospheric, words are the visual
-
Change
4. Background: dark, warm gradient. Generous whitespace.
- Remove5. "WHY BIZZ?" label
- Remove6. Both "Nutrient Name" placeholder cards
Copy Block — ready to paste
Most cognitive tools are built around intensity.
More stimulation. Higher doses. Faster kicks.
The cycle of peaks and corrections — overshoot,
crash, compensate, repeat.
It works until it doesn't. And when it stops working,
the answer is always the same: take more.
We started with a different question.
A/B Test Variants
Variant B: "Your brain isn't broken. The modern world broke the conditions it needs."
Variant C: "What if the goal wasn't more stimulation — but less interference?"
Design direction: Think of this as the opening page of a book. Dark warm tones, large type, no navigation clutter. Let the words do the work. The visitor should feel they've entered a different kind of brand.
- KeepThe core statement — this is the philosophical center of the brand
-
Change
1. Give it museum-wall treatment — large display font, centered, maximum whitespace. This should feel like walking into a gallery and seeing one statement on an empty wall.
-
Change
2. Tighten body copy ~40% — cut from 4 paragraphs to 2. Museum-wall treatment works better with fewer words.
-
Add
3. Scroll-anchor CTA below section: "↓ See what we chose" — first interactive element on the page, breaks up 2+ viewports of pure text.
Copy Block — ready to paste
The mind doesn't need to be overpowered.
It needs to be supported.
Your brain already moves through states — focus,
calm, creativity, sleep. We build tools that work
with that system, not against it.
Less intervention. More alignment. That's the insight
BIZZ is built on.
Design direction: Museum-wall treatment. Oversized serif or display font. Centered. Generous vertical padding (at least 80px top/bottom). Let this section breathe — it's the philosophical center of the entire brand.
Scroll anchor: Add a centered, subtle link below this section: "↓ See what we chose" — anchors to The Choice section. This is the first interactive element on the page and breaks up two viewports of pure text.
Media sourcing: REMOVE: Golden capsule imagery and supplement infographics. Replace with: Editorial visuals for each choice — (1) Natural: chicle/sapodilla photo or botanical illustration, (2) Restraint: single FLOW piece, massive negative space (P8: Hand Shots), (3) Transparency: Supplement Facts panel photo (P12). All shots are in the agency shot list. Interim: Design layout with placeholder boxes; real images drop in as they arrive. Source: Agency + KJ. Timeline: Real photos by May 2.
- KeepConcept of showing what BIZZ chose
-
Change
1. Imagery shift: current golden capsules comparison → more editorial. Think Aesop ingredient stories, not comparison tables.
-
Change
2. Frame as 3 specific choices told as brief stories (see copy block)
-
Add
3. Soft "Shop FLOW →" CTA at bottom (first purchase opportunity on page)
- Remove4. Supplement-infographic imagery
- Remove5. "100% Natural" and "Measurable Results" labels
Copy Block — ready to paste
The choices we made.
NATURAL, NOT SYNTHETIC.
We chose natural chicle and mastic resin — tree sap, not
the synthetic polymers that make up most commercial gum bases.
It costs more. It behaves differently in production.
We chose it anyway.
RESTRAINT, NOT EXCESS.
Each piece of FLOW carries 16 carefully measured
ingredients. Not 47. Not a proprietary mega-blend.
Not a kitchen-sink formula designed to look
impressive on a label. Enough. Not more.
TRANSPARENCY, NOT MYSTERY.
Every ingredient is listed with its exact dose
on our How It Works page. No "proprietary blends."
No hidden ratios. If we put it in the gum, we tell
you what it is and how much is there.
[Shop FLOW →]
Design direction: Each of the three choices should feel like a short editorial story. Think Aesop's ingredient pages — beautiful type, generous spacing, maybe a subtle texture or botanical illustration alongside each one. Not a comparison table. Not infographics. Stories.
STRONGEST CONCEPTUAL VISUALIZATION ON THE ENTIRE SITE — KEEP AS-IS
- KeepThe circular diagram exactly as-is — strongest conceptual visualization on the entire site
- Keep"Designed for ripple effects." headline
-
Change
1. Only suggestion: soften connecting lines if they feel too "tech diagram" — very minor
Copy Block — ready to paste
Designed for ripple effects.
A brain state isn't just a feeling — it's the
foundation for everything that follows. Focus shapes
your work. Calm shapes your relationships. Rest
shapes your resilience.
When you support one state well, the effects extend
into the parts of life that matter most.
Research Tracks — REMOVED
This section is removed from Why BIZZ. The Brain States page already owns the Research Tracks roadmap with pipeline cards and "Notify Me" email captures. Duplicating it here dilutes both pages.
The page now ends on Ripple Effects — the strongest conceptual visualization on the entire site. A more powerful ending than a pipeline list.
Page reduction: ~5.5 viewports → ~4 viewports.
An Open Research System — REMOVED
This section is removed entirely. The photo grid with caption cards reads like a slide deck. The research philosophy is already communicated through The Insight and The Choice sections.
Removing this section brings the page from ~8.5 to ~5.5 viewports.
Why BIZZ — Page Summary
Before:
Hero →
The Insight →
The Choice →
Ripple Effects →
4x Nutrient Cards →
An Open Research System →
Research Tracks →
Footer
After:
Hero (The Problem) →
The Insight + ↓ scroll anchor →
The Choice + CTA →
Ripple Effects →
Footer
Removed: "An Open Research System" section, Research Tracks (owned by Brain States), 4 nutrient placeholder cards, 6 redundant "WHY BIZZ?" labels
Added: "↓ See what we chose" scroll anchor after The Insight, "Shop FLOW" CTA on The Choice
Changed: Insight body copy tightened ~40% (4 paragraphs → 2), Hero Variant C replaced with core positioning question
Result: ~8.5 viewports → ~4 viewports (53% reduction)